
- Alcalá la Real, Jaén

.
For the UGT, collectivisation was a structured, transitional step. They favoured a regulated system that respected small-scale private property owners who did not support the rebellion. The UGT worked closely with the official Republican government, utilising state credits and maintaining a traditional wage system, albeit managed democratically by worker councils. Their focus was on maximising production to sustain the wartime economy through official channels.
.
The CNT viewed the vacuum of power as an opportunity for immediate social revolution. In the villages where they held sway, the anarchists pushed for the complete abolition of private property, capitalism, and sometimes even currency, replacing money with local vouchers. They established libertarian communism, where everything was held in common, and distribution was based on need rather than hours worked. Despite these fierce ideological debates, the material reality of the olive harvest forced compromise. Olive cultivation required a massive, coordinated seasonal labour force. Ultimately, the two unions were forced to form joint committees in many Jaén villages to manage the complex logistics of pressing, storage, and transporting olive oil to the hungry cities of the Republican zone.
.




.
- Valladolid, Old Castile
On 30 September, Republican pilot Julio Alegría Caamaño took off from Getafe with mechanic Facundo Gumiel Garrazosa in a Hispano E-30, officially bound for Los Alcázares in Murcia. Instead, Alegría changed course and flew north into Nationalist territory, landing at Medina de Rioseco in Valladolid province. The landing was a deliberate defection by the aircraft’s crew rather than a Republican operational flight unexpectedly forced down behind Nationalist lines. Alegría was already an experienced civilian pilot who had joined Republican aviation after the uprising and had flown a series of missions during the opening months of the war. His subsequent career confirms that the flight to Medina de Rioseco represented a change of sides: he entered Nationalist aviation, qualified as a military pilot and later served with several Nationalist flying units. The incident delivered an intact Hispano E-30 and its mechanic into Nationalist hands.
.

- Ourense, Galicia
On the morning of 30 September 1936, five soldiers formed a firing squad at the Campo de Aragón, beside the former San Francisco barracks in Ourense, and shot Erundina Álvarez Pérez. She was thirty-seven years old, a waitress, mother of three daughters, and a politically active woman from Ferreiros, in the municipality of Entrimo. the Nationalist authorities accused her of hiding Francisco Cofán Eiriz, a Republican supporter being sought for his involvement in resistance to the July military uprising.
.
Erundina had been born in Santos, Brazil, in 1899, where her parents, Rosa Pérez and Benito Álvarez, had emigrated from Ferreiros. The family returned to Galicia in 1910, and she grew up in Entrimo before moving to Ourense to work as a waitress. She could read and write and became politically active; accounts of her life describe her as libertarian or anarchist in sympathies, though the surviving official documentation is much less precise about a formal organisational affiliation. She was also an unmarried mother for much of her adult life, raising three daughters, María, Justa and Encarnación, before marrying the considerably older farmer Constante Álvarez González in May 1935.
.
By 1936, Erundina and her daughters were living in Rúa da Liberdade in Ourense. The man she was accused of sheltering, Francisco Cofán Eiriz, had been involved in one of the few attempts to impede the fascist seizure of Ourense in July. Cofán was wanted for participation in the cutting of telegraph lines near the petrol station at the Xardín do Posío, close to the Casa del Pueblo, an attempt to disrupt communications while supporters of the Republic tried to resist the military rebellion. Giving him refuge consequently placed Erundina directly in danger once the Nationalists controlled the city.
.
She was arrested on 23 September, only a week before her death. Accounts based on family testimony state that she was initially imprisoned at Bande, where she suffered beatings, humiliation, and psychological abuse, before being transferred to the San Francisco barracks in Ourense. Her three daughters were left without their mother. A neighbour named Miguel, described by the family as an anarchist, subsequently took the girls on foot from Ourense back to their grandparents at Ferreiros.
.
Seven days after her arrest, Erundina was taken to the Campo de Aragón. The site had been used for executions since 11 August, and would eventually see 133 people shot by firing squad between 1936 and 1939. Erundina was the only woman among those 133 victims. She was killed by the five-man military firing squad on the morning of 30 September and buried the following day in niche 923 of San Francisco cemetery. Five men were also recorded as executed at the Campo de Aragón that morning, on unrelated charges – Francisco Domínguez, Juan Salgado López, Antolín Martínez Basalo, José Ramón Barja García and Juan González de Jesús. Contemporary reporting places their executions at approximately 6.30 am after being condemned by a Consejo de Guerra.
.
Erundina left behind three daughters, aged sixteen, twelve and ten. The youngest, Encarnación, later remembered being taken away with her sisters after their mother’s arrest and never seeing her again. Among the hundreds killed during the repression in Ourense province, Erundina’s case preserves something that aggregate figures cannot: within seven days, a working mother accused of sheltering a Republican could go from arrest to a firing squad.
.
- Salamanca, Old Castile
On 30 September 1936, the Bishop of Salamanca, Enrique Pla y Deniel, published the pastoral letter Las dos ciudades (The Two Cities). Written little more than two months after the military uprising, it provided one of the clearest early statements of Catholic support for the Nationalist rebellion and presented the Civil War as a struggle in defence of Christianity rather than simply a contest for political power. The title came from St Augustine’s City of God and its division between the City of God and the earthly city. Pla y Deniel applied that religious framework directly to Spain. On one side he placed those fighting for what he described as religion, the patria, and Christian civilisation; on the other he placed forces associated with atheism, revolution, and communism. The Republic itself contained Catholics and parties far removed from revolutionary communism, but this distinction largely disappeared within the bishop’s description of the conflict.
.
Pla y Deniel explicitly defended the military uprising. He argued that the rebellion had become justified because Spain faced revolutionary disorder and the destruction of religion. The severe anti-clerical violence in Republican territory after July 1936. including the killing of priests and members of religious orders and the burning or seizure of churches, gave the Church hierarchy powerful evidence with which to present a Nationalist victory as necessary for the survival of Spanish Catholicism. Most importantly, Las dos ciudades described the conflict as a ‘Crusade’. The word gave the Nationalist war effort a religious meaning: fighting for the rebellion could be presented not merely as service to an army or political movement, but as participation in a struggle for Catholic Spain. This language became increasingly prominent in Nationalist propaganda and in Catholic explanations of the war.
.

- Granada, Andalucía
- Huelva, Andalucía
The definitive turning point occurred just before the final week of September. On 19 September 1936, Nationalist columns completed the occupation of the rugged northern Sierra by capturing the absolute final Republican-held municipalities in the province: Hinojales, Cumbres de Enmedio, Cumbres Mayores, and Cumbres de San Bartolomé. With zero organized Republican military or administrative presence left by September 24–30, Huelva transitioned entirely into a Nationalist rear area. The military authority under General Gonzalo Queipo de Llano shifted from frontline warfare to imposing total civil subjugation through strict military governance, heavy economic confiscations, and harsh censorship. The final week of the month was defined by highly decentralised, systematic executions. To obscure the numbers, Nationalist squads routinely rounded up victims in one town and drove them to neighbouring municipal cemeteries to be shot without death certificates, leaving thousands buried anonymously in roadside trenches.
.
Historians place the final number of victims executed by the Nationalists in Huelva at between 5,000 and 6,000 people. By 30 September 1936, it is estimated that at least 3,500 to 4,000 of these individuals had already been murdered. Because Huelva was home to a highly organized left-wing mining community (the Rio Tinto basin), the Nationalist columns under command of General Queipo de Llano acted with exceptional ferocity. Massive, systematic executions took place in Huelva city itself, as well as along the walls of regional municipal cemeteries.
.
- Cadiz, Andalucía

.
The baseline historical consensus for Nationalist repression across the 41 municipalities of Cádiz is between 3,000 and 4,000 documented executions. By 30 September 1936, nearly 2,500 to 3,000 of these deaths occurred in the frantic first ten weeks of the war. Cádiz fell almost instantly to the rebel forces arriving from North Africa. Rather than combat deaths, the toll here was almost exclusively political cleansing of the civilian population. Mayors, union workers, teachers, and freemasons were systematically rounded up by paramilitary groups like the Zamacola squadrons. The final week of September saw these numbers spike as the Nationalists overran the refugee strongholds in the Sierra de Cádiz and executed those who had fled into the mountains. Together with Seville, Córdoba, and Badajoz, Huelva and Cádiz formed a block of five southwestern provinces that bore the absolute brunt of the early Francoist sweep, combining for more than 25,000 extrajudicial executions in the opening months of the war alone.