Who Were the ‘Two Sides’ in the Spanish Civil War?

 * To be clear, this is not a ‘both sides’ defence of the Spanish Civil War. One half of the country were the people, who had won the recent election, and wanted to be treated as equals. The other side was a vicious invading army who sought to destroy civilians, and caused irreparable harm. This article is to help if you are new to the topic. 

Historians often use the terms ‘Republican’ and ‘Nationalist’ for simplicity and readability, but neither side of the Spanish Civil War was politically unified. Both were broad coalitions containing groups with profoundly different visions for Spain’s future, many of whom distrusted one another almost as much as they hated their enemies. Modern readers can also struggle with the terminology because words such as ‘Republican,’ ‘liberal,’ ‘socialist,’ and even ‘fascist’ carried meanings in 1930s Spain that do not neatly align with modern political language, especially with the distortion caused by crumbling American politics constantly making international news. Republican is now associated with right-wing groups, liberal and socialist are both insults, fascism and nationalism are both still dangerous yet strangely underestimated, and communism and anarchism have been intentionally villainised. Yet understanding these differences outside of modern day interpretations is essential to understanding Spain’s history.

The conflict which erupted in July 1936 was not simply a struggle between two ideologies. It was a collision between revolution and counter-revolution, secularism and clericalism, regional identity and central authority, democracy and authoritarianism, reform and reaction. Millions of ordinary Spaniards found themselves trapped between these forces as the country descended into catastrophe. Of course, not all people would align perfectly with any group; they may believe in some parts of an ideology, but not all of it. These constantly clashing beliefs meant that two brothers could head to war, but for opposing sides, despite been raised in the same social class. Each description here is generalised, not to pigeonhole each person into a group.

  THE LEFT-WING REPUBLICANS

The Republicans were not a single ideology, but a coalition defending the Second Spanish Republic, the elected government established after the monarchy fell in 1931. Many Republican supporters agreed on only one thing – opposition to the military uprising launched in July 1936. Within the Republican zone existed enormous political divisions, and those divisions would increasingly shape the course of the war itself.

  • Liberal Republicans

Moderate republicans generally supported parliamentary democracy, constitutional reform, secular government, and gradual modernisation. Many came from educated middle-class backgrounds and believed Spain had remained politically and economically backward compared to much of Europe. Their reforms during the Second Republic included expanding public education, reducing the political power of the military, limiting the influence of the Catholic Church within government, and introducing legal reforms such as divorce and women’s suffrage. These liberals were not revolutionaries in the socialist or anarchist sense. Many feared violent revolution almost as much as they feared fascism. Their goal was usually a modern democratic Spain similar to France or other European republics. However, this form of slow, comfortable change did not benefit the working class, and the middle-class were not eager to do anything that might disrupt their comfortable lives.

  • Socialists

Spanish socialism covered a broad spectrum of beliefs and strategies. Some socialists hoped to achieve reform gradually through elections and trade unions, while others believed capitalism and stagnant, traditional Spanish society could only be transformed through revolution. The socialist movement was closely tied to industrial workers, miners, railway workers, and urban trade unions. Conditions for many workers in Spain during the early twentieth century were undeniably harsh, with widespread poverty, inequality, poor housing, no women’s rights, severely limited healthcare, and dangerous working conditions. For many working-class supporters, socialism represented not abstract theory, but the hope of better wages, land reform, education, and dignity. For many who worked rurally, living conditions had not advanced in hundreds of years, barely living lives beyond feudalism, still trapped as peasants.

Among this group reigned La Unión General de Trabajadoras y Trabajadores boasting 1.5 million members, including 50,000 from the Federación Nacional de Trabajadores de la Tierra (Land Workers Federation). The UGT was aligned with the Partido Socialista Obrero Español (PSOE, Spanish Socialist Workers’ Party), Spain’s oldest political party, who were in power in a majority government in 1936 (and peacefully lead Spain today under Pedro Sanchez).

Anarchist militiawoman Ana Garbín Alonso standing on a barricade,  by Antoni Campañà i Bandranas, Wikimedia Commons
  • Communists

The communist movement in Spain was relatively small before the war but grew rapidly during the conflict because the Soviet Union became one of the Republic’s few major foreign supporters. Communists generally argued that the Republic could only survive by creating a disciplined centralised army instead of relying on loose revolutionary militias. Soviet military aid, tanks, aircraft, advisers, and political organisers gave communist groups increasing influence inside Republican Spain. Communist organisations also became deeply involved in internal Republican power struggles, especially against anarchists and anti-Stalinist groups such as the POUM. To many supporters, communism represented disciplined resistance against fascism, and went from 30,000 member at the start of the war, to upwards of 400,000 members (some estimate’s claim up to one million) within one year. To critics, it increasingly represented Soviet interference and political repression within Republican territory itself. Because the communist movement had international support in a  way other Republican groups did not, this created an uneasy alliance.

Noel Carritt, a communist revolutionary from Oxfordshire, by unknown author, Wikimedia Commons
  • Anarchists

Spain possessed one of the largest anarchist movements in Europe, particularly in Catalonia and Aragón. Unlike socialists or communists, anarchists did not simply seek to take control of the state – many wanted to abolish the oppressive hierarchical government entirely. Organisations such as the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT or National Confederation of Labour) and Federación Anarquista Ibérica (FAI or Iberian Anarchist Federation)believed society should be organised through workers’ collectives, local assemblies, and voluntary cooperation rather than governments, aristocrats, churches, or capitalist ownership. The CNT-FAI is now celebrated as one of the most successful collaborations in worker-managed socialism and anarcho-syndicalism in modern history. At its peak, the CNT had 1.5 million members and represented many workers unions, while the FAI brought another 1.5 million members.

When the military uprising failed in parts of Spain during July 1936, anarchist movements helped unleash a genuine social revolution. Factories, farms, workshops, transport systems, and even hotels were collectivised in some regions. Revolutionary slogans covered walls, churches were seized or destroyed, and traditional social structures briefly collapsed. For many workers and labourers, this represented liberation and equality. For conservatives and many middle-class Spaniards, it represented terrifying chaos and the destruction of civilisation itself. Anarchist imagery, militia columns, and armed women became some of the defining symbols of the early war.

Anarchist militia in Barcelona, by Antoni Campañà, Wikimedia Commons
  • Regional Autonomists

Regional identity played an enormous role in the conflict, particularly in Catalonia and the Basque Country, and are referred to under different name, such as regional nationalists or separatists, fighting to maintain the autonomy of the area where they lived. Many Catalans supported the Republic because it granted varying degrees of regional autonomy, allowed the preservation of Catalan political and cultural identity, and would empower their worker populations. Barcelona became one of the great centres of revolutionary Republican Spain. The Basque situation was even more complex. Many Basques were deeply Catholic and socially conservative yet still sided with the Republic because they feared Franco would destroy Basque autonomy and regional freedoms. These regional movements remind modern readers that the war was not simply ideological. Questions of language, culture, regional identity, and local government were deeply important throughout Spain. Franco and the Nationalist sought to ban autonomy of Spain’s many regional autonomies and languages, which were, and remain, an essential part of Spain as a collection of regions bound together on the Iberian peninsula.

Pro-republic Basque fighters in Elgeta, Gipuzkoa, Basque Country, by unknown author, Wikimedia Commons
  • Soviet Union

The Republic’s most important state supporter was the Soviet Union. Unlike Italy’s mass deployment, Soviet involvement focused on military advisers, tank crews, pilots, intelligence personnel, and weapons deliveries. The Soviets supplied T-26 tanks, aircraft, artillery and small arms. The T-26 was arguably the best tank in Spain during the early stages of the war. Several hundred Soviet specialists served directly in combat roles, though Moscow generally avoided sending large infantry formations. Estimate range between 2,000-3,000 men on the ground rotated in and out throughout the war.

An interesting note is that there were more German and Italian anti-fascists fighting for the Republic in the International Brigades than there were Soviet citizens sent by Stalin. Thousands of German and Italian exiles volunteered to fight, whereas Moscow kept its direct military presence relatively limited.

  • The Partido Obrero de Unificación Marxista, POUM

The POUM or Workers’ Party of Marxist Unification, was a smaller anti-Stalinist Marxist party most famous internationally because of its association with George Orwell. The group opposed fascism but also distrusted Soviet communism and Stalin’s growing influence within Republican Spain. Members believed the war against Franco could not be separated from wider social revolution.

As Soviet-backed communists gained power inside the Republican coalition, the POUM became increasingly targeted. Its leaders were arrested, persecuted, or killed during internal Republican political struggles. The existence of the POUM demonstrated how divided the Republican coalition truly was. Even while fighting Franco, elements inside Republican Spain were simultaneously fighting one another politically and sometimes violently. Despite being a small group, the POUM claimed 40,000-70,000 members and 8,000 militants at the start of the war.

POUM demonstration, by unknown author for The Spanish Revolution (POUM periodical)
  • The International Brigades

The most famous foreign volunteers of the war were the International Brigades. These units were organised with Communist assistance and recruited volunteers from more than fifty countries. Around 32,000–35,000 men and women served over the course of the war. Major groups included volunteers from France, Germany, Italy, Britain, Ireland, Poland, Yugoslavia, Hungary, Canada, United States, Australia, and New Zealand. Many were refugees from fascist regimes who believed Spain was the first battlefield in a wider struggle against fascism. The Brigades suffered extremely heavy casualties, and those who survived were often villainised or imprisoned when they returned home.  

THE RIGHT-WING NATIONALISTS

The Nationalists emerged from the military uprising launched against the Republic in July 1936. Like the Republicans, they were also a coalition rather than a single ideology. What united them was opposition to the Republic, fear of revolution, their anti-communism and conservative Catholicism, and their belief that Spain required authoritarian order. Many supporters believed Spain was collapsing into atheism, class warfare, regional fragmentation, and social disorder, a fear not unfounded, as these things represented a way to empower the lower classes. The Nationalist movement promised hierarchy, unity, discipline, religion, and the destruction of revolutionary politics.

  • Army Officers

Senior military figures such as Francisco Franco and Emilio Mola believed the Republic had weakened Spain through political instability, regional separatism, labour unrest, and attacks upon traditional authority. Many officers had served in Spain’s indescribably brutal colonial wars in Morocco, where military violence and authoritarian discipline were considered necessary tools of control. These experiences shaped the mentality of many future Nationalist commanders. The military uprising was not a democratic movement. It was an attempt by armed officers to overthrow the elected government and replace it with authoritarian rule.

Nationalist soldiers at the Franco victory parade, Madrid, by unknown author
  • The Falange

The Falange was Spain’s fascist movement, founded by José Antonio Primo de Rivera. Inspired partly by Italian fascism, the movement promoted authoritarian nationalism, political violence, militarism, anti-communism, and the destruction of liberal democracy. Falangist propaganda glorified sacrifice, discipline, masculinity, youth, and national rebirth. Its supporters often marched in uniform, used fascist salutes, and embraced confrontational street politics even before the war began. At the start of the war, the Falange only had 10,000 members, and that was a result of multiple fascist groups joining together. By the outbreak of war, the number grew to 25,000, though 70% were under the age of 21, thanks to propaganda and student movements that aligned with the rich and powerful. Within a year, as Franco took over the Falange, number swelled to 250,000, two-thirds of which were in Franco’s army.

Members of the Spanish Falange in front of the basilica of Nuestra Señora del Pilar in Zaragoza, by author unknown
  • Carlists

The Carlists were radical ultra-conservative monarchists who supported a rival branch of the exiled Spanish royal family and defended militant Catholic traditionalism. Unlike fascists who often embraced modern political spectacle, the Carlists looked backward toward a deeply religious and traditional Spain rooted in monarchy, localism, and Catholic authority. Their requeté militias became famous for their red berets, religious banners, and brutal battlefield reputation, and had a mindset that the war was their crusade for their 40,000 soldiers. The existence of the Carlists demonstrates how strange the Nationalist coalition could be. Traditionalist monarchists and modern fascists often disliked one another intensely yet fought side by side against the Republic. Through the 19th century, the Carlists had fought multiple brutal wars against their own people to establish order in Spain, including the Third Carlist War of 1874), where 100,000 armed volunteers, crushed vast swathes of the Basque Country, Catalonia, and Aragon.

Requete detachment during the Spanish Civil War by unknown author
  • Conservative Catholics

Many ordinary Catholics supported the Nationalists after anti-clerical violence exploded in Republican territory during the chaotic opening months of the war. Churches were burned, priests and nuns were killed, religious artwork destroyed, and Catholic institutions attacked in parts of Republican Spain. Nationalist propaganda heavily emphasised these atrocities, portraying the conflict as a holy crusade against atheism and godlessness. For many conservative Catholics, support for the Nationalists came not from fascist ideology, but from fear that religion and traditional society itself were under attack. Conservative Spaniards often viewed socialism as a direct threat to religion, property, and social order. At the same time, Franco would later use Catholicism as one of the central pillars of his dictatorship, tightly linking church authority to the authoritarian state.

  • International forces

The Army of Africa (Ejército de África) was not technically an international intervention,  was the most effective fighting force available to the Nationalists in July 1936. It consisted of the Spanish Foreign Legion (Tercio), and Moroccan Regulares. The Regulares were indigenous Moroccan soldiers recruited in Spain’s protectorate in northern Morocco. Around half were Europeans who served in the Spanish Legion and the artillery, while the rest were Moroccans, most of whom were in the Regulares and Mehelas, and by the time the war ended, Morocco had sent about 8,000 men. They were commanded by Spanish officers and had earned a fearsome reputation during the Rif Wars of the 1920s. Francisco Franco had spent much of his early career commanding these troops and knew their value. When the coup began in July 1936, the Army of Africa became trapped in Morocco. German and Italian aircraft helped airlift thousands of troops across the Strait of Gibraltar in what was then the largest military airlift in history. The Moroccan troops quickly gained a reputation among Republican civilians for their discipline in combat but also for brutality, rape, looting, and reprisals, especially with the atrocities  advance through Extremadura and Andalusia. By late 1936 they were among the most feared troops in Spain.

  • The Condor Legion (Legión Cóndor)

Condor Legion was Nazi Germany’s military force sent to assist the Nationalists. It arrived in late 1936 after a request from Franco. The force included fighter aircraft, bombers, anti-aircraft units, tank crews, signals specialists, military advisers. The Germans wanted to prevent a left-wing victory, gain influence with Franco, and test new weapons and tactics. Many future Second World War commanders served there, including Wolfram von Richthofen. The Condor Legion became famous for its air operations, and by the end of the war around 19,000 German personnel had served in Spain, though only a fraction were present at any one time.

Condor Legion training camp in Avila, by unknown Germán author
  • Italian Corpo Truppe Volontarie (CTV)

The largest foreign force fighting for the Nationalists came from Fascist Italy. The Italian expeditionary force, known as the Corpo Truppe Volontarie, was sent by Benito Mussolini. At its peak it numbered roughly 45,000 regular army troops and 29,000 fascist militiamen. The Italians provided infantry divisions, tanks, artillery, aircraft, and naval support Unlike the Germans, who concentrated on specialist roles, the Italians often fought as large independent formations.

Italian troops leaving the Battle of Guadalajara, by unknown German author
  • Portuguese Volunteers (Viriatos)

The authoritarian government of António de Oliveira Salazar strongly supported Franco. Several thousand Portuguese volunteers crossed the border to fight for the Nationalists. These men are often collectively called the Viriatos, after an ancient Iberian warrior, although they did not form a single organised unit, and estimates of troop number vary between 8,000-12,000. Portugal was particularly important because it provided safe supply routes, border access, diplomatic support, and intelligence cooperation. Without Portuguese assistance, Nationalist logistics would have been much more difficult.

Viriatos propaganda poster, author unknown

Understanding these coalitions is essential because the Spanish Civil War cannot be understood as a simple struggle between two unified sides. The Republican coalition contained liberals, anarchists, communists, socialists, regional nationalists, and revolutionaries who often disagreed profoundly about Spain’s future. However, on the battlefield, with limited supplies, these differences would have meant far little in the face on ingoing armies supplied with weapons, back-up and authority to leave no one unharmed.

The Nationalist coalition united fascists, monarchists, conservative Catholics, military officers, and reactionary traditionalists behind an authoritarian military uprising. The war also did not end in 1939 with reconciliation or democratic compromise. Franco’s victory led to decades of dictatorship, censorship, imprisonment, executions, political repression, and the destruction of many of the freedoms introduced during the Second Republic. The Spanish Civil War was not merely a military conflict. It was a struggle over what kind of country Spain would become; modern or traditional, secular or clerical, democratic or authoritarian, and its consequences shaped Spain for generations.

NEW – BECOMING THOMAS CROMWELL: ON THE FICKLENESS OF LOYALTY

AVAILABLE 4 MAY 2026

Before Thomas Cromwell could rule Henry VIII’s England, he first had to survive Machiavelli’s Florence.

Thomas Cromwell is eighteen when he arrives in Florence, carrying little but the memory of war and the instinct to survive.

Taken into the household of the powerful Frescobaldi, he finds himself in a city balanced between republic and ruin, where Piero Soderini governs in the uneasy absence of the Medici, and where influence is measured not in titles alone, but in gold, information, and silence.

Under the watch of Francesco Frescobaldi, and in the orbit of Niccolò Machiavelli, he begins to understand that power is rarely declared, but quietly constructed through alliances, through deception, and through trade. For Florence’s wealth does not rest in its streets, but in its reach. From Rome to the Low Countries, from the Papal monopoly of alum to the court of King Henry VII of England, commerce binds the city to forces far beyond its walls. And where such wealth moves unseen, so too does danger.

Yet not all risks are counted in coin. As Cromwell is drawn deeper into the lives of those around him, loyalty begins to blur, and the cost of belonging reveals itself in ways he cannot easily control.

As the Italian Wars redraw the balance of Europe, Cromwell is pulled ever further into a network of ambition and secrecy, where survival demands more than obedience, and where every choice leaves its mark.

In Florence, nothing is ever simply bought or sold. And every debt must be paid in full.

PRE-ORDER IN HARDBACK AND KINDLE NOW 

ON THE FICKLENESS OF LOYALTY – THOMAS CROMWELL AUTHOR Q+A

Welcome to the author Q+A! I tried to combine question where possible to fit everything into one post.

On the Fickleness of Loyalty is out now here, or your chosen Amazon site. It might take a few days to load on other stores’ sites (can’t control that, sorry!)

Why do you like Thomas Cromwell so much? How long have you been researching Cromwell? Why Cromwell?

The question I get asked most often! Why Thomas Cromwell is easy for me. For the vast number of men at the Tudor court, they are duke/baron/whatever of somewhere, the son of  duke/baron/whatever of somewhere, on and on and on. For the women, the are the lady of somewhere, daughter of him and her of somewhere, on and on and on. Then there is Thomas Cromwell, a guy from nowhere, with no family pedigree, no history anyone can trace, who, on a mixture of charm, quality public speaking, and the ability to remain invisible when it suited, managed to make his way through life to the very top of society. The story writes itself. I love a cheeky opportunist. It gives so much more range, because Cromwell was not confined by court rules or social customs like other people. He had to go to great lengths to rise high as a nobleman at court, earn every penny personally, and put up with the grief he would get from those born with a silver spoon. For the first 45 years of his life, he disappeared from England as a teenager, only to turn up years later in Florence, and then in Antwerp and Middelburg a decade later, marries for a modest inheritance and family connections to let him work as a lawyer, and be accepted into Gary’s Inn without any actual legitimate education. By the time King Henry noticed Cromwell, he was a multi-millionaire (by today’s standards), and all entirely on his own work. Attempting to help his master Cardinal Wolsey saw Cromwell placed into court life and ends up recreating government as we know it today and breaking down the Catholic Church’s hold over England. The scope of storyline in fiction is immense in a way others at court don’t have. When I wrote my first three novels on Cromwell, I felt like the narrative could have gone on forever, and now, doing his early life, I can spread out so much wider again, add new characters, and create a whole new world. I don’t want to write about a man who was born on third base. I don’t want to write about a pretty girl with rich parents and the ability to read. I want bigger than that, and the nobility rarely provides it. (I am happy to read about what others make of them of course)

Why put Cromwell in Florence instead of England with Wolsey?

Because Florence is amazing! The history of Florence is incredible, and it is the only location, other than Garigliano, that Cromwell can be placed before 1510. It created such a massive world for me to build, because the majority of historical novels in Florence feature the Medici, but Cromwell lived there in a period where the Medici were ousted. No one says they are dying to write about the reign of Piero Soderini, do they? The way Florence was run under Soderini’s rule was totally different the structure to the century prior under Medici rule, or the century after, also under Medici and papal rule. There was this small pocket of time where anything can be created, and it was the exact time that Cromwell lived in Florence. Cromwell can walk down the street and help Botticelli with his bag, have dinner with Michelangelo, catch up with da Vinci at a goodbye party, buy remedies from Caterina Sforza, throw stones at the statute of David (which was apparently a popular activity), and most importantly, drink at a bar with Machiavelli, who, I discovered, was nothing like his works would suggest.

What sources or records were most important in shaping your version of Cromwell’s early life? Are the Frescobaldi family real?

Matteo Bandello’s story of the Frescobaldi family is the only written record of Cromwell under the age of 25, and that was limited to a few lines. It was enough for me to recreate the Battle of Garigliano at the start of book one, before moving to create a world about a young unemployed Englishman hungry enough to take on anything. The Frescobaldi family mattered a great deal to Thomas Cromwell, as seen by later actions back in England and his close relationships with the allies who lives in London. Again, the story of a starving teen soldier stumbling into the path of a Florentine family who takes pity on him practically writes itself.

There is a book, underrated in my opinion, The Winter King by Thomas Penn, which has some of the most well researched information on the smuggling operation the Frescobaldi family created with King Henry VII. These were shrewd people who managed to get their name into the most powerful circles of Europe; Henry VII, James IV, Duchess Margaret of Savoy, Maximilian, King of the Romans, Pope Julius II, Philip of Burgundy and Juana of Castile. The scale of historical figures I can use is limitless.

When the comes to the Frescobaldi family, which is still prestigious today, the people I have created are not based on the real life people of 1503-1513. There are similar names, yes, and the Frescobaldi palaces are a location, but the people are 100% fictional. The information about these particular generations of the family are limited to their business dealings in ledgers around Europe; their personal lives are not a subject for scrutiny. I completely made up the characters. However, what is happening in Florence and Europe at the time is completely accurate, with people at different levels of power having to deal with the realities that life sent them. I have worked as closely as possible with primary sources to ensure that when they are in the city, they are dealing with what was happening at that time, when they travel, they must skirt around war and disease accurate to the period. Historical events and weather anomalies change their lives the way it would have 500 years ago.

Is this another Medici drama based in Florence? Is this like a mystery novel, or more a historical take on Florence? How much Machiavelli is in this book?

In 1494, Piero de’Medici, ruler of Florence for only two years, lost control and the Medici family were exiled. Girolamo Savonarola came in as a religious fanatic and completely upended the city and its way of life before he was eventually killed less than five years later. Piero Soderini, a politician and statesman, stepped in and was eventually voted in for life to rule over the Republic of Florence, which was controlled by councils that regularly rotated men in and out of power, until the Medici storm the republic and recapture the city in 1513. For the bulk of the series, the Medici are a threat in the distance, giving other families and alliances to breathe. In the first book, Cromwell is constantly reminded of his dealings with Piero de’Medici at Garigliano, which he hates.

As for Machiavelli, he does pop up from time to time. In this time period, he is not the great author that his name inspires, he is a chancellor and diplomat with varying degrees of skill, poor decision-making skills, and exceptionally loose morals. It is a mystery novel I guess, in that there is an element of mystery, however most of the mystery is how long the characters will take to admit the inevitable truth they already know.

Do you see Cromwell as someone shaped more by ambition or by circumstance? Do you think Cromwell knew how high he would rise in life? Do you think Cromwell ever wanted to stay in Europe?

There must have been a fairly large portion of Cromwell that ran on ambition, to reach the heights he did. But the bulk of his life is only seen through his ten years at the royal court for Henry VIII. He could have tried breaking into court much earlier, but chose not to, despite ample opportunity to do so. He was able to sit in parliament in 1523 on behalf of Sir  Thomas Grey, and gave a speech to the king, telling him not to go to war because of the provisioning costs, and yet that was not at all what he was meant to do in parliament. Grey wanted petitions for the north to be read (I can assume they were, though records from 1523 have been destroyed). Did Cromwell  burn with an ambition to create modern government? Did he burn with desire to create the Church of England? I don’t think so, but when the opportunity came, he took it. It tends to be a theme throughout his years prior to court life too, he found himself somewhere, with certain people, and chose to make the best of it. As a result, he ended up with a wide network of friends in different places, not in high places, but in places where he was respected. As for staying in Europe, it is hard to tell. From what I can gather, his father died around the time Cromwell retuned to England. Obligation kept him home for the rest of the 1510s, except for few times to Italy.

How do you decide when to stay strictly accurate to history, and when to let the story take over?

Generally, I will change history if I have to for the story, but it might mean I move a historical event up by two months or something and the story doesn’t get affected in any way. There aren’t huge changes to history as we know it. Because many of the characters are fictional, I can bend them around history. One example in book one is the death of Isabella of Castile in late 1504, and then the shipwreck of Philip of Burgundy and Juana of Castile in early 1506. It would have been great if I could have moved one of those events to have them close together, but instead I moved around the lives of fictional characters and made it fit. I don’t like changing history if I can avoid it. One thing to consider though is that different people from different places and cultures see different events in a different light. How an event is perceived in one place may not be the way you perceive in yours as the reader.

Are there parts of Cromwell’s life that are harder to write than others? Is it hard to write when there are so few historical facts to use?

I hate writing romance! No shade to romance authors, I just hate doing it myself. I’m amazed I ever managed it. Cromwell’s personal life is a blank, throughout his life. Yes, he had a wife at one stage, but I don’t place much stock in that. Marriage was a system where even the poorest man could have a maid. He made a choice based on what appears to be a smart financial decision to marry someone related to his brother-in-law, who could offer him legal work. That gave me plenty of scope when writing my 1529-1540 series, because there are zero romantic entanglements to have to deal with, and it was great. Now, in this series, because so many people are fictional, or I have been able to research their personal lives, I can be entirely fluid with sexuality as much as I please outside the traditional notions of arranged marriages and tepid relationships between strangers. The men and women of Florence were up to A LOT. Though, no, I don’t write sex books, don’t worry.

Another thing is the clothing of the period. I don’t want to get bogged down in dresses or caps, or hairstyles, I describe things in a basic way and move on. Please google if you want an in-depth idea! There are some exceptions; I do describe fabrics, as that is relevant to Frescobaldi trade, and the cover image, of Cromwell wearing a red brocade cloak with gold embroidery is very relevant. He wears this cloak (that obviously is not his) and it starts a chain of events that spiral out of control over a year. Fabrics are relevant to how a person felt in society, but this isn’t a great book if you want fancy gowns.

I was amazed by how much historical research I could use in this book. I was unsure when I started if I could fill a book covering 1503-1513, and before I realised it, I had written four books’ worth. I started writing this series in early 2023, but it was interrupted by several non-fiction contracts I needed to finish, and real life got really hard in 2024 and 2025. It has been very nice to finally finish this project.

It says book one of Becoming Thomas Cromwell, what more could there be? Is this book part of a series? Does this book match up with your other Cromwell series?

This book covers 1503 at Garigliano, though to early 1506 when Cromwell… well, you have to read it. In this book, Cromwells works at Palazzo Frescobaldi and is a secretary helping with the smuggling arrangement for King Henry in England and dealing with a lot of metaphorical ghosts of things that have happened. Book two, currently scheduled for a Christmas 2026 release, covers 1506-1508, book three in mid-2027 will cover 1509-1511, and Christmas 2027 will have book four covering 1512-1513. Could it go beyond that? It’s entirely possible. The Becoming Thomas Cromwell series is in the same universe as the Queenmaker series, and you will recognise certain characters that are in both.

Why do you only write about men?

Seriously? Who do you think is running all these men?

One thing that falls in Cromwell’s favour is that he helped people when they were down. He helped women when they had been wronged. He pulled wayward husbands into line. He gave out money and did not get it back. Cromwell didn’t look down on people, and when I write fiction like this, where young Cromwell is beguiled by the powerful women he encounters, he gives him their dues, he sees their importance. I will always write that way, and I don’t have to bend history to do it. Had there been a plucky opportunistic who was female at court, maybe I would have written her. Instead, I took historical figures and made fictional women around them. I wish we had more primary sources on women, written by women, about women, for women. But we don’t.

I know many people like to portray Anne Boleyn as a kind of hero, but I don’t see her that way. She did some nice things for some people, and she did some horrible things too. People generally get annoyed at Cromwell works because he was the man who killed Anne Boleyn, and no, there is nothing that can redeem such an act. I literally wrote Planning the Murder of Anne Boleyn, and I didn’t do it to absolve Cromwell of his part in it, but it does show the underbelly that propelled Anne to her death, entirely because of her husband. So please, send me rude messages about Cromwell if you like, but I have a tight schedule, so don’t expect a reply.

THE COMPLETE TRANSCRIBED LETTERS AND REMEMBRANCES OF THOMAS CROMWELL NOW UPDATED 2025

THE TRANSCRIBED LETTERS AND REMEMBRANCES OF THOMAS CROMWELL

Four hundred years passed between Thomas Cromwell’s death in 1540 and the recognition that this faithful servant was more than another agent of Henry VIII. Born a common man with no recorded education, Cromwell became a wealthy lawyer, politician, minister, and peer of the realm, and created the modern style of government in England. An extraordinary man of wisdom, charm, strategic cunning, and boasting an incredible memory, Cromwell redefined bureaucracy, broke a nation from Rome, reformed parliament, created royal supremacy and developed the revolutionary administrative procedures still in place today.

But after his execution, Thomas Cromwell became an intellectual genius lost to history, only now again known for his brilliance, finally appearing out from the shadows of the king he served. Cromwell laid the foundations for the success of Britain throughout the centuries, emerging from archives through the past seventy years of fine academic research, and now historical fiction brings the great man into public view once again.

Many know of Thomas Cromwell’s life through the words of others, their letters, tales, and opinions passed down through the years, with much of Cromwell’s vast correspondence lost to time and destruction. For the first time, Cromwell’s surviving letters are together in a single volume, alongside his personal remembrance lists, transcribed from original primary sources. Here are Thomas Cromwell’s letters on an array of subjects, without opinions from others, without the legal definitions of his legislation, the chance to read Cromwell’s own words.

AVAILABLE WORLDWIDE IN HARDBACK, PAPERBACK AND ON KINDLE 

 AVAILABLE HERE 

OTD with Thomas Cromwell – 29 October 1533: Cromwell discusses Queen Katharine with King Henry

Katherine of Aragon, Charles Robert Leslie, 1826, Royal Academy of Arts 03/1361

Cromwell wrote to King Henry as the king was away from London, to tell him of the progress with sending his warrants to Queen Katharine as Cromwell was preparing to put his Queen Katharine Act through parliament, settling her income and lands from her marriages. Cromwell also mentions concerns of the ‘traitorous’ Observant Friars, and their involvement with Elizabeth Barton, the Holy Maid of Kent, who Cromwell needed to interrogate, and money owed to Henry from the Emperor. 

MASTER CROMWELL TO KING HENRY VIII, 29 October 1533 (SP 1/80 f. 50)

It shall please your royal majesty to be informed how that returning homewards, one of my lord Chancellor’s servants met with me and delivered me your warrants, signed with the hand of the princess dowager (Queen Katharine), which I do send to your Grace herein enclosed. What your pleasure shall be to have done I shall right gladly accomplish.

I have also since my return to London spoken with Friar Lawrence, who has since his return to London heard several things touching the holy maid which he will declare to your highness and no other, and he showed me also that there be two strange friars of the order of Observants lately returned into this realm, which two friars have explored here. For all such books, sentences and determinations as has passed touching your highness, Matrimony, which they intend with other privy practices to convey with them, to Friar Petow who as I am credibly informed sent them into your realm. The said two friars as I am ascertained have brought with them privy letters to diverse people and now have gone to the said princess dowager. In my poor opinion it shall be right well done that they might be sent for by some trusty person, howbeit would be best that they first should be suffered to speak with her and such others of hers as would peradventure deliver to them anything, whereby their further practice might be perceived and so their cankered intents might be thereby deciphered. I am also informed that there is a merchant of London which does practice with them in this premise. I shall go very near to have knowledge therein. If it be true, he is worthy to suffer to make others beware in time if he is of good substance. I will this day go about to know the truth of these things would be met with all in time and the sooner the better. I trust your highness will, by this bearer, advertise me in writing what shall be your pleasure touching the said friars, as also touching of the said dowager’s warrants.

I have also sent to your Grace one acquittance to be assigned for the 24 thousand crowns due to your highness for the residue of the Emperor’s diet and also a warrant to your Chancellor for the sealing of the same warrant and acquittance. It may please your majesty to assign and to send the same by this bearer to Robert Fowler, who may be dispatched. The rest of the acquittances for your ordinary pension and sale been already signed and sealed. And this, the holy trinity to whom I shall continually pray to preserve your highness in long life and most prosperous health and send the same the victory with honour over all your enemies.